On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:52:18 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: >>I don't particularly care about the details, I just want some public >>API for this. Making warn_explicit public seems better to me, since >>it was already there in previous versions of Python, and it lets you >>completely ignore both the filters list and the global registry, but >>if others would rather make the filters and global registry a part of >>the public API, that's fine by me as well. > >Why do you say warn_explicit isn't public? It's in both the 2.5 and 2.6 API >docs for the warnings module. Brett told me it was private (on this list several weeks or a month or so ago). It's also no longer called in 2.6 by the C implementation of the warning system. Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4