Guido van Rossum wrote: > But I think we should think about this more. I don't think anyone > expects the code inside any particular test_foo.py to have a stable > public interface. But quite a bit of the test support infrastructure > is reused by third party test frameworks. I think we should > acknowledge and support such reuse. I'm personally fine with that approach, but some of the new items in there for 2.6 could probably use a bit of cleaning up to improve the APIs and/or the way they work. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4