On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'd say so, yes. If tracker issues don't exist yet, please create them. >>> The >>> focus for the first beta was really on getting all the syntax and API >>> changes stable - the remaining time between the first beta release and >>> the >>> first release candidate will focus on cleaning up issues like this. >> >> I wonder if we could just 2to3 (with fixers that create >> incompatibilities disabled) over the whole stdlib and see what >> happens. > > Just running the unit test suite with -3 would probably be a better starting > point. 2to3 makes a lot of extra changes that we don't particularly care > about. Right, which is why I suggest running a few fixers (ie fix_has_key) and then tearing the test suite apart. -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4