Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080592.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal: Run GC less often

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Run GC less often
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Run GC less often
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> What happens if the program enters a phase where it's not
> producing any new cyclic garbage, but is breaking references
> among the old objects in such a way that cycles of them
> are being left behind? Under this rule, the oldest
> generation would never be scanned, so those cycles would
> never be collected.

Correct. However, this is the case already today.

> Wouldn't it be simpler just to base the collection frequency
> directly on the total number of objects in the heap?

Using what precise formula?

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Run GC less often
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Run GC less often
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4