2008/6/15 Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com>: > From: "Armin Ronacher" <armin.ronacher at active-4.com> >> >> There are far more responses for that topic than I imagined so I would >> love >> to write a PEP about that topic, incorporating the ideas/questions and >> suggestions discussed here. > > Instead of going straight to a PEP, I recommend opening a new wiki page > on the topic, letting people post sample pure python implementations, > pros/cons of various APIs, showing sample use cases, and analyzing > the O(n) behavior of various implementation strategies. That sounds reasonable. I'm +1 in principle, but would like to see the details thrashed out. BTW, as a meta-question, where is this proposal targeted for? I'd assume 2.6/3.0 are closed now, as we're hitting betas - so are we looking at 2.7/3.1? (Just a quick sanity check on the timing...) Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4