RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 13 19:20:03 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080350.html

Walter Dörwald wrote:

> [...] 
>> Sure, we could do that, but please use a different name,
>> e.g. .encodeall() and .decodeall() - .encode() and .decode()
>> are already stateles (and so would the new methods be), so
>> "stateless" isn't all that meaningful in this context.
> 
> I like the names encodeall/decodeall!
> 
>> We could also add such a check to the PyCodec_Encode() and _Decode()
>> functions. They currently do not apply the above check.
>>
>> In Python, those two functions are exposed as codecs.encode()
>> and codecs.decode().
> 
> This change will probably have to wait for the 2.7 cycle.

BTW, what I noticed is that the unicode-internal codec seems to be broken:

 >>> import codecs
 >>> codecs.getencoder("unicode-internal")(u"abc")
('a\x00b\x00c\x00', 6)

I would have expected it to return:

 >>> import codecs
 >>> codecs.getencoder("unicode-internal")(u"abc")
('a\x00b\x00c\x00', 3)

Servus,
    Walter

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080350.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Betas today - I hope