A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080134.html below:

[Python-Dev] on Python's tests (and making them better)

[Python-Dev] on Python's tests (and making them better) [Python-Dev] on Python's tests (and making them better)Steven D'Aprano steve at pearwood.info
Sat Jun 7 05:42:19 CEST 2008
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:58:06 am Eric Smith wrote:

> > Really? Given the choice between core_language (divided into syntax
> > and builtins) and stdlib you wouldn't know where to look?
>
> Really. I wouldn't bother thinking about it.  I'd just grep.

Since you'll do the same thing regardless of whether the tests are 
nested or not, I don't think you should object to the proposal. "I'm 
against it because it will make no difference to me" is not what I call 
a good objection.

Some people might prefer to cut down their false positives by splitting 
the tests into sub-directories. You can still get all the false 
positives you want by writing

grep -r -I parrot *

instead of 

grep -I parrot *



-- 
Steven
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4