Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>>> - reorganizing the tests into separate directories >>> Why this one? >> I always find it hard to find a test I'm looking for in a directory >> with 365 different tests in it. Also grouping tests by function will >> hopefully help reduce duplication and it more intuitive. > > Still, I don't think this should be done. Flat is better than nested, > and adding hierarchy will make it *more* difficult to find anything > (except perhaps for the one person who did the rearrangement). > > I personally use grep to find the place where to add a new test. I agree. There's not much chance I'd know which directory a test for a given piece of functionality is in, so instead of grepping in a single directory, I'd have to grep in all of them. Definitely more hassle. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4