RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jun 5 19:48:12 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080074.html

I'll have a cleaned version to you by end of day, and by day, I mean
by 10:00 EST :)

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> I've accepted your PEP. I think it still needs some clean-up and
> perhaps clarification of the agreement reached about API style, but
> there is nothing now that keeps you from implementing it! Hopefully
> you'll make the beta release early next week.
>
> --Guido
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jesse Noller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> However, the flip side of this is that no one really "likes" the
>>>> threading API as-is, so putting the module into the standard library
>>>> with the matching API simply adds another "broken" API.
>>>
>>> Provided threading gets a PEP 8 style API in 2.6 (which it looks like it is
>>> going to), then I don't see a problem with multiprocessing only providing
>>> the new API.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nick.
>>>
>>
>> Fantastic. If no one has any other arguments to the contrary, I'll run
>> with the new API naming scheme.
>>
>> Now I have a lot of tests and documentation to rewrite.
>>
>> -jesse
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080074.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 371: Additional Discussion