Nick Coghlan wrote: > Greg Ewing wrote: >> Nick Coghlan wrote: >> >>> - remove support for passing a single value to a format string >>> without wrapping it in an iterable first >> >> But won't that clobber a large number of the simple >> use cases that you want to keep %-formatting for? > > Note the part of the proposal that allows *any* iterable on the right > hand side rather than the current insistence on a tuple. So the > single-value use cases can be boxed easily with a list. > > To my mind salvaging %-formatting requires removing the ambiguity over > whether or not the right hand side will be iterated over. > But that either needs doing for 3.0 or waiting until 4.0 right? Personally I only *occasionally* find the tuple interpolation a problem and am perfectly happy with the current % string formatting... Michael Foord > Cheers, > Nick. >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4