RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 2 18:05:07 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/079982.html

On 5/31/08, Mark Hammond <mhammond at skippinet.com.au> wrote:
>  So it seems that maybe simply "setExecutable()" isn't the correct
>  abstraction here, but maybe a "factory" approach, so the entire process
>  creation mechanism can be replaced rather than just the name of the
>  executable to spawn?

Indeed. If the spawn mechanisms (and even the connection mechanisms)
were fully abstracted, then I believe that extending pyProcessing to
work in clusters with something like MPI would be far easier. But
perhaps I'm just dreaming...

-- 
Lisandro Dalcín
---------------
Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC)
Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/079982.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 371 Discussion (pyProcessing Module)