On 31/05/2008, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > 2008/5/30 Farshid Lashkari <flashk at gmail.com>: >> I'm not sure if there will be any side affects to modifying >> sys.executable though. Should this be the official way of supporting >> embedded interpreters or should there be a >> multiprocessing.setExecutable() method? > > +1 for setExecutable (I'd prefer set_executable, to be PEP 8 > compliant). Make it explicit, rather than fiddling with stuff in sys > manually. That is easy to do. An issue not mentioned in the PEP is naming conventions. In recent versions I have tried to consistently use mixedCase for functions and methods (other than factory functions) because that is what threading does (give or take settrace(), setprofile(), stack_size().) I am certainly open to using lowercase/lower_case_with_underscores for all functions/methods except for Process's methods and possibly currentProcess(), but I would like some feed back on that.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4