On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Sebastien Loisel <loisel at temple.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Josiah Carlson <josiah.carlson at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> language, I would ask you if logix >> (http://www.livelogix.net/logix/intro.html) would suit you better. It >> seems to allow you to use arbitrary punctuation for operators. > > Thank you for the pointer. I have taken a look and it does look interesting, > on first blush I would love to use that language. The main thing is that I > worry about being out on the fringe, using a language that nobody uses, and > which may get abandoned without warning (like Sun abandoned `self'), or be > buggier just because people don't use it... Have you considered OCaml? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocaml) It's in reasonably broad use and is actively maintained, and it allows user-defined infix operators. A programming language can't be all things to all people. That's why there's room in the world for more than one. -- Curt Hagenlocher curt at hagenlocher.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4