On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 22Jul2008 20:56, John J Lee <jjl at pobox.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Cameron Simpson wrote: >> [...] >>> Leaving aside the 0.2 => 0 converstion, shouldn't read() raise an >>> exception if asked for < 1 bytes? Or is there a legitimate use for read(0) >>> with which I was not previously aware? >> >> http://docs.python.org/lib/bltin-file-objects.html >> >> read([size]) >> >> ... If the size argument is negative or omitted, read all data until EOF >> is reached. ... > > Hmm, yeah, but 0 is not negative and not omitted so this does not apply. Well, -1 *is* < 1 (and is in the domain of the function), but yes -- sorry, read too quickly, took your "< 1" too literally. John
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4