Thomas Heller wrote: > Guido van Rossum schrieb: >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote: >>> From: "Eric Smith" <eric+python-dev at trueblade.com> >>>> I have this ready for checkin (with docs and tests). I'd like to get it >>>> in for this beta, since it does involved changed behavior, no matter how >>>> small ('1e+100' becomes '1E+100' with '%F'). But it relies on the >>>> platform's vsnprintf to do the right thing with 'F', so I'm worried >>>> about breakages on platforms I don't have access to. Resolving those >>>> issues might take a few days. >>>> >>>> Any advice on checking this in now, or waiting until after this beta is >>>> released? >>> I recommend doing it after the release. It's unlikely to be exercised >>> much by the beta users so there's no real advantage. If you wait >>> until afterwards, then there is time to let the buildbots have a go >>> at it and reveal any cross-platform issues. >>> >>> Besides, Barry said something about getting meaner. >>> Would hate to find out what he meant the hard way ;-) >> I'd advise the opposite -- check it in now. It's not going to break >> anything, and if it is, let's find out sooner rather than later. >> > > Before we get old waiting for the windows buildbots, here how test_format > fails now (on XP SP2 x86, trunk rev 65072: > > c:\svn\trunk\PCbuild>.\\python_d -E -tt ../lib/test/regrtest.py test_format > test_format > test test_format produced unexpected output: > ********************************************************************** > '%F' % (1.0,) == '' != '1.000000' > u'%F' % (1.0,) == u'' != '1.000000' > '%f' % (nan,) == '-1.#IND00' != 'nan' > u'%f' % (nan,) == u'-1.#IND00' != 'nan' > '%F' % (nan,) == '' != 'NAN' > u'%F' % (nan,) == u'' != 'NAN' > '%f' % (inf,) == '1.#INF' != 'inf' > u'%f' % (inf,) == u'1.#INF' != 'inf' > '%F' % (inf,) == '1.#INF' != 'INF' > u'%F' % (inf,) == u'1.#INF' != 'INF' > > ********************************************************************** > 1 test failed: > test_format > [23521 refs] > > c:\svn\trunk\PCbuild> > > Windows vsnprintf does not support '%F' at all, and '%f' does not > behave as expected with nan and inf. > I was afraid of that. I'll back these out until I can dig up a Windows box to test on. Thanks for checking this. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4