A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081304.html below:

[Python-Dev] Unittest PEP do's and don'ts (BDFL pronouncement)

[Python-Dev] Unittest PEP do's and don'ts (BDFL pronouncement) [Python-Dev] Unittest PEP do's and don'ts (BDFL pronouncement)Ben Finney ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Thu Jul 17 04:36:13 CEST 2008
Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> writes:

> Yes, but unless I misunderstand you, you don't regard a mass
> renaming of the module's functionality and removal of existing
> aliases as a change to the API.

You slightly misunderstand me. The above changes *are* a change to the
API, by definition. My position is that those changes, which *only*
(and deliberately) change names without changing behaviour, are far
below the threshold that might justify a new module.

> As far as I'm concerned, if I have to alter my code to use the
> updated module you have changed the API. Test code is particularly
> sensitive to such changes.

I agree entirely with this.

-- 
 \         “Smoking cures weight problems. Eventually.” —Steven Wright |
  `\                                                                   |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4