Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> writes: > Collecting testcases from the filesystem is a pain. But actually > writing tests (including custom TestCases) using the unittest API is > fine. I find unittest straightforward and readable, I like it. > > I don't understand a lot of the criticism comes in for. For my part, I wanted the redundancies removed and the PEP 8 conformance fixed as a precondition too *any* addition to the unittest API. Without those two (and the BDFL's pronouncement at the head of this thread means they're not an option), I can't see the unittest API getting anything except increasingly hideous and painful to use. -- \ “Never do anything against conscience even if the state demands | `\ it.” —Albert Einstein | _o__) | Ben Finney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4