Terry Reedy wrote: > > > Michael Foord wrote: >> Collin Winter wrote: > >>> Is any provision being made for a 2to3 fixer/otherwise-automated >>> transition for the changes you propose here? >>> >> >> As the deprecation is intended for 2.X and 3.X - is 2to3 fixer needed? > > A fixer will only be needed when it actually is needed, but when it > is, it should be a unittest-name fixer since previous 3.x code will > also need fixing. Since the duplicates are multiples names for the > same objects, the fixer should be a trivial name substitution. Can 2to3 fixers be used for 2to2 and 3to3 translation then? Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ http://www.trypython.org/ http://www.ironpython.info/ http://www.theotherdelia.co.uk/ http://www.resolverhacks.net/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4