Michael Foord wrote: > Collin Winter wrote: >> Is any provision being made for a 2to3 fixer/otherwise-automated >> transition for the changes you propose here? >> > > As the deprecation is intended for 2.X and 3.X - is 2to3 fixer needed? A fixer will only be needed when it actually is needed, but when it is, it should be a unittest-name fixer since previous 3.x code will also need fixing. Since the duplicates are multiples names for the same objects, the fixer should be a trivial name substitution.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4