A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081086.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposed unittest changes

[Python-Dev] Proposed unittest changes [Python-Dev] Proposed unittest changesBen Finney bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au
Tue Jul 15 00:21:27 CEST 2008
"Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com> writes:

> Given all of the language changes in 2.6 and 3.0, I would think that
> it is dangerous to make any changes at all to the unittest API. That
> module is the one anchor in a sea of change.

Agreed. I'm not proposing to have the unittest API change at all in
Python 2.6 or 3.0. These changes, even the first deprecations, would
not be suitable for anything earlier than 2.7 and 3.1.

-- 
 \        “When in doubt tell the truth. It will confound your enemies |
  `\   and astound your friends.” —Mark Twain, _Following the Equator_ |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4