Raymond Hettinger wrote: >> Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> writes: >> >>> The full list of changes proposed (feel free to start - but ping me or >>> the list) and not shot down was something like: >> […] >> >> Thanks. I'm working these into another draft PEP that I hope to have >> up in a day or two. > > > Given all of the language changes in 2.6 and 3.0, I would think > that it is dangerous to make any changes at all to the unittest API. > That module is the one anchor in a sea of change. > As proposed the changes don't remove or rename anything - so there will be no code breakage, just additional test methods. However, as we're into the beta phase I don't think these changes can make 2.6 / 3.0 anyway. Michael > > Raymond > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ http://www.trypython.org/ http://www.ironpython.info/ http://www.theotherdelia.co.uk/ http://www.resolverhacks.net/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4