Ben Finney wrote: > That's another reason to avoid "assert" in the name: these methods > *don't* necessarily use the 'assert' statement. Avoiding the > implication that they do use that is a good thing. Perhaps some positive alternative such as "verify" could be used instead. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4