Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> writes: > "we have a plan to make 'unittest' conform with the existing PEP 8" > - that was the outcome of the discussion. PEP 8'ification to begin > in 2.7 / 3.1 with the deprecation of non-PEP8 compliant method > names. Thanks, that's exactly the reassurance I was hoping for :-) > I volunteered to take it on, and have a record of the whole > discussion. Unfortunately my writing commitment is going to keep me > occupied until August - after which it will be one of my highest > priorities. I've contacted you yesterday regarding this, but to reiterate: This issue is of interest to me, and I'd like to help with it if I can. Please contact me privately if I can be of assistance, especially if I can help during your busy period. -- \ “The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're | `\ still a rat.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin | _o__) | Ben Finney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4