Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam <at> benfinney.id.au> writes:
>
> That would better be written (preferring PEP 8 names)
> "fail_unless_equal".
Which is still a double negative ("fail" and "unless" are both negative words).
> That's another reason to avoid "assert" in the name: these methods
> *don't* necessarily use the 'assert' statement.
But all those constructs (assert, assertEqual, etc.) raise the same exception
type named AssertionError which, if you care for naming consistency, is more
important than whether or not they are implemented in terms of each other. :-)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4