RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 11 16:50:21 CEST 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081005.html

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> Yes, indeed. We should make sure, however, that the changes in the 2.6
>> libraries are the absolute minimum to get the job done. (I'm trying to
>> pretend like this isn't violating the prohibition on all-inclusive
>> overhauls in the stdlib.)
>>
> The prohibition is on *gratuitous* changes, basically along the lines of "if
> it ain't broke, don't fix it". The stdlib is definitely broken if it raises
> warnings of that kind.

Just because it's massive breakage fixage doesn't mean that it's
unlikely to break something else. :)

>
> regards
>  Steve
> --
> Steve Holden        +1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
> Holden Web LLC              http://www.holdenweb.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/musiccomposition%40gmail.com
>

-- 
Cheers,
Benjamin Peterson
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1."

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081005.html below:

[Python-Dev] Running Py2.6 with the -3 option