On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
>
> The premise is the OP's idea that Python should switch to all UCS4 to create
> a more pure ('ideal') situation or the idea that len(s) should count
> codepoints (correct term?) for all builds as a matter of purity even though
> on it would be time-costly on 16-bit builds as a matter of practicality.
Wrong term - code units and code points are equivalent in UTF-16 and
UTF-32. What you're looking for is unicode scalar values.
--
Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4