> Please remember that lone surrogate pair code points are perfectly > valid Unicode code points, nevertheless. Just as a lone combining > code point is valid on its own. Actually, I think they aren't (not any more than an invalid codepoint, or an unassigned codepoint). They are reserved for UTF-16 only. I would have to lookup the exact Unicode terminology, but "valid" is probably not a predicate that they would use. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4