On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:48 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai at in-nomine.org> wrote: > My apologies for hammering on this, but I think it is quite important and > currently Python 3.0 seems confused about UCS-2 versus UTF-16. [...] Your seem to be suggesting that len(u"\U00012345") should return 1 on a system that internally uses UTF-16 and hence represents this string as a surrogate pair. This is not going to happen. You may as well complain to the authors of the Java standard about the corresponding problem there. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4