> For programmers who want to target a 2-byte format (for win32 > compatibility, for example) As MAL said, this is taking the discussion in the wrong direction. For people on Windows, win32 isn't a "compatibility" consideration. I suspect most users of the other platforms MAL mentioned and all others with their own native unicode implementations would agree. Cheers, Mark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4