On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >> I just committed r64651 which is my attempt to add support to >> fix_imports so that modules that have been split up in 3.0 can be >> properly fixed. 2to3's test suite passes and all, but I am not sure if >> I botched it somehow since I did the change slightly blind. Can >> someone just do a quick check to make sure I did it properly? Also, >> what order should renames be declared to give priority to certain >> renames (e.g., urllib should probably be renamed to urllib.requeste >> over urllib.error when not used in a ``from ... import`` statement). > > Well for starters, you know the test for fix_imports is disabled, right? Why was this test disabled, rather than fixed? That seems a rather poor solution to the problem of it taking longer than desired to run. Collin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4