> If the intent is really to do a source-only releases mostly for system > vendors, then I don't see the harm in leaving those changes in. I mean, > a vendor is going to cherry pick the ones they want anyway, so let's > just make it easy for them to do this. That might mean publishing the > svn logs a long with the source release, or publishing each diff and log > message separately. It's not just vendors, also end-users who are concerned about the security of their installations. > I would be bummed to rollback the email package changes. You don't have to - I will do it for you (although I don't understand fully what "to be bummed" means). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4