RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jan 27 19:54:56 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/076564.html

On Jan 27, 2008 10:54 AM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
> > Then int(<float>) can be defined by deferring to trunc()
> > -- as opposed to round().
>
> That part is new and represents some progress.  If I understand it
> correctly, it means that we won't have both __int__ and __trunc__
> magic methods.  That's a good thing.

A single type wouln't need both. But int() should still try both,
because it doesn't make sense for e.g. a date type to have to define
__trunc__ for conversion to an int.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/076564.html below:

[Python-Dev] trunc()