"Jeffrey Yasskin" <jyasskin at gmail.com> wrote in message news:5d44f72f0801261600l4ea2d006vd58fa5999ba73197 at mail.gmail.com... || To elaborate the point I was trying to make: If float() does not mean | "the float part of" The 'float part' of a complex number is meaningless since both components of a complex are floats (in practice, or reals in theory). The same is true in polar representation. | and should not take a complex argument (which I | completely agree with), then int() does not mean "the int part of" and | should not take a float argument. The 'integer (int) part' of a float/rational/real is established thru decades of usage. Your consequent is false and in no way follows from your antecendent. tjr
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4