Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Jan 26, 2008 1:16 AM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote: > >> Are you planning to backport bytearrays? >> I thought we had clearly decided to *not* backport any of the text/bytes model so that the >> Py2.6 string/unicode model remained pure. >> > > 'bytearray' is a separate issue. It's a brand new type: a *mutable* > byte array. Its status as a built-in and completely different API > makes it much more convenient than using the old array module. > Introducing bytearray is not going to disturb the balance between > str/bytes/unicode. > I'm looking forward to having a native mutable bytes type in Python 2.x. Michael Foord
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4