""Martin v. Löwis"" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote in message news:47992363.3010402 at v.loewis.de... |> If the ambiguity is that 'int' behaviour is unspecified for floats - is | > it naive to suggest we specify the behaviour? | | The concern is that whatever gets specified is arbitrary. There are many | ways how an int can be constructed from a float, so why is any such way | better than the others, and deserves to be the meaning of int()? Decades of usage, in English, with the meaning it already has in Python.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4