Raymond Hettinger wrote: > Since something similar is happening to math.ceil and math.floor, > I'm curious why trunc() ended-up in builtins instead of the math > module. Doesn't it make sense to collect similar functions > with similar signatures in the same place? Traditionally the math module is a tiny wrapper around the system's libm. Functions for magic hooks like __trunc__ usually end up in builtins. In this particular case I don't mind where the function is going to live. Christian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4