Ronald Oussoren wrote: > Ah, so ~/.local is "just" a per-user variation on /usr/local? I didn't > even know of that convention before this thread started, I tend to use > ~/local (without dot) instead. I assume ~/.local was first introduced by the freedesktop.org people. On my box it's only used for some desktop related apps like ~/.local/share/Trash or XFC4. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/basedir-spec Contrary to ~/local, the dot local directory doesn't show up, unless the user unhides dot files. Christian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4