A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/076238.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 370, open questions

[Python-Dev] PEP 370, open questions [Python-Dev] PEP 370, open questionsChristian Heimes lists at cheimes.de
Thu Jan 17 10:41:35 CET 2008
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> The Mac directories look fine to me.
> 
> Is it worthwhile to note in the PEP that the directories for the Mac are
> already used in Python 2.5?

Good point!

>> * Mac: Should framework and non-framework builds of Python use
>>  the same directories?
> 
> Yes, because that makes supporting users easier and keeps things nice
> and simple (no need to ask which kind of Python they installed to
> determine where their user directory is).  Distutils should already link
> extensions in a way that allows you to have a python2.6 unix-build and
> framework-build that share the same site-packages directory.

Have you read glyph's posting? He brought up some good points why Python
on Mac should use ~/.local.

Framework builds have an additional import directory in ~/Library/Python

Christian
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4