A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/076237.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 370, open questions

[Python-Dev] PEP 370, open questionsRonald Oussoren ronaldoussoren at mac.com
Thu Jan 17 09:58:45 CET 2008
On 17 Jan, 2008, at 8:55, Christian Heimes wrote:

> The PEP 370 (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0370) "per user site
> packages directory" has several open questions:
>
> * Are the directories for Windows, Mac and Unix fine?

The Mac directories look fine to me.

Is it worthwhile to note in the PEP that the directories for the Mac  
are already used in Python 2.5?

>
> * Mac: Should framework and non-framework builds of Python use
>  the same directories?

Yes, because that makes supporting users easier and keeps things nice  
and simple (no need to ask which kind of Python they installed to  
determine where their user directory is).  Distutils should already  
link extensions in a way that allows you to have a python2.6 unix- 
build and framework-build that share the same site-packages directory.

Ronald
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2224 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20080117/0fdd4064/attachment-0001.bin 
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4