> There seems to be a use case for it still, otherwise > collections.namedtuple wouldn't be added to 2.6, right? Perhaps; I'm not strongly opposed to keeping structseq. I'll work on making stat_result and struct_time regular fixed-size types, for 3.0. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4