On 09/01/2008, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote: > It's not an issue for experienced users. For the rest we can put a link > in the start menu under Python 2.5 which opens a new explorer with the > user package directory. Um, I'm an experienced user and it's an issue for me... The problem isn't so much knowing where the directory is, as that tools (quite rightly) ignore (ie, hide!) hidden directories. For example, 4NT (my command shell) doesn't auto-complete hidden directory names by default, many tools' wildcard matching ignores them (always, not just by default). Blast, I said I wasn't going to start a big flamewar over Windows behaviour. I haven't seen anyone propose that something intended to be edited by a user be stored in a hidden directory (appdata) on Windows. As long as that is the case, I don't care. If you are suggesting that a file intended to be viewed/edited by a user manually should go in AppData, then please be explicit. We can then argue the concrete issues, rather than just theoretical principles. Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4