A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/075924.html below:

[Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages

[Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packages [Python-Dev] pkgutil, pkg_resource and Python 3.0 name space packagesSteven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Sun Jan 6 19:00:47 CET 2008
On Jan 6, 2008 8:33 AM, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote:
> * PJE: Does pkg_resource have an easy way to overwrite a package in a
> name space package? E.g. an user wants to overwrite Python's
> databases.sqlite with a newer version of sqlite. Can he simply do it by
> inserting a package into sys.path before Lib/ ?

Do we really want to encourage this?  Wouldn't that just introduce
more pyxml-like nightmares?  I've been bitten way too many times by
pyxml overwriting the regular xml package and causing version
incompatibilities.  I'd hate for this kind of thing to become common
practice.

Steve
-- 
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
        --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4