RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 4 21:05:55 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/075877.html

A.M. Kuchling wrote:

> So, do Python implementations need to guarantee that list(dict_var) ==
> a later result from list(dict_var)?

As I just posted to the blog, yes. Look at section 3.8 of the reference 
manual
(Mapping Types), specifically footnote 3:

http://docs.python.org/lib/typesmapping.html

(3) Keys and values are listed in an arbitrary order which is non-random,
varies across Python implementations, and depends on the dictionary's
history of insertions and deletions. If items(), keys(), values(),
iteritems(), iterkeys(), and itervalues() are called with no intervening
modifications to the dictionary, the lists will directly correspond.
This allows the creation of (value, key) pairs using zip(): "pairs =
zip(a.values(), a.keys())". The same relationship holds for the
iterkeys() and itervalues() methods: "pairs = zip(a.itervalues(),
a.iterkeys())" provides the same value for pairs. Another way to create
the same list is "pairs = [(v, k) for (k, v) in a.iteritems()]".

Tim Delaney 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/075877.html below:

[Python-Dev] Repeatability of looping over dicts