On Jan 3, 2008 11:49 AM, Fred Drake <fdrake at acm.org> wrote: > For those of us still using Python 2.4 and earlier, it's hard to be > motivated to worry about Python 3.0, no matter how wonderful it > looks. (It doesn't help that my own available time appears to > decrease daily with the kids and all.) Oh, just get rid of the kids. :-) > Python 2.6 seems to be entirely targeted at people who really want to > be on Python 3, but have code that will need to be ported. I > certainly don't view it as interesting in it's own right. It will be though -- it will have genuine new features -- yes, backported from 3.0, but new features nevertheless, and in a compatible fashion. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4