Joseph Armbruster wrote: > With respects to the bug tracker, when I select Search and Python 2.6, I > retrieved 208 open bugs. At a quick glance, I found two that were windows, > but not tagged appropriately. If it's worthwhile, I can spend some time > this evening browsing the list of current 2.6 bugs to see if there are any > duplicates, collisions, etc. The bug tracker is an issue and in my opinion a development hindrance, too. It contains almost 1,400 bugs, about 450 w/o a target version and about 400 more bugs with a target version <= 2.4. The bug tracker was discussed two threads "Bug tracker: meaning of resolution keywords" and "1324 bugs in the tracker" lately. I don't want to repeat the arguments here but Brett's answer http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/90137 is worth reading. Christian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4