On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 02:49:27PM -0500, Fred Drake wrote: -> On Jan 3, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: -> > My main gripe is with code contributions to Py3k and 2.6; Py3k is -> > mostly done by a handful of people, and almost nobody is working much -> > on 2.6. -> -> For those of us still using Python 2.4 and earlier, it's hard to be -> motivated to worry about Python 3.0, no matter how wonderful it -> looks. (It doesn't help that my own available time appears to -> decrease daily with the kids and all.) -> -> Python 2.6 seems to be entirely targeted at people who really want to -> be on Python 3, but have code that will need to be ported. I -> certainly don't view it as interesting in it's own right. 3k and 26 are, however, the only place where we can propose new features -- which makes it the place for cleanup and additional testing, as well as backwards-incompatible bug fixes... --titus
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4