On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:25PM -0200, Facundo Batista wrote: -> 2008/1/3, Titus Brown <titus at caltech.edu>: -> -> > What needs to be done with 2.6? I'm happy to review patches, although -> > even were commit access on offer I'm too scatterbrained to do a good job -> > of it. -> -> We have 109 patches open for 2.5 [1], and 118 patches open for 2.6 [2]. The question is, is reviewing patches a good place to contribute? Also, if I (and others) could have a "core mentor" with commit access, that might streamline things. As it is, I am worried that patch reviews will pass through the ether without leaving a visible trace; that's OK and understandable, but it's demotivating. (I've had a very good experience with Georg and documentation commits for GHOP.) cheers, --titus
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4