A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/075815.html below:

[Python-Dev] Contributing to Python

[Python-Dev] Contributing to PythonTitus Brown titus at caltech.edu
Thu Jan 3 20:51:44 CET 2008
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:25PM -0200, Facundo Batista wrote:
-> 2008/1/3, Titus Brown <titus at caltech.edu>:
-> 
-> > What needs to be done with 2.6?  I'm happy to review patches, although
-> > even were commit access on offer I'm too scatterbrained to do a good job
-> > of it.
-> 
-> We have 109 patches open for 2.5 [1], and 118 patches open for 2.6 [2].

The question is, is reviewing patches a good place to contribute?  Also,
if I (and others) could have a "core mentor" with commit access, that
might streamline things.  As it is, I am worried that patch reviews will
pass through the ether without leaving a visible trace; that's OK and
understandable, but it's demotivating.

(I've had a very good experience with Georg and documentation commits
for GHOP.)

cheers,
--titus
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4