RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jan 3 20:49:27 CET 2008 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/075814.html

On Jan 3, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> My main gripe is with code contributions to Py3k and 2.6; Py3k is
> mostly done by a handful of people, and almost nobody is working much
> on 2.6.

For those of us still using Python 2.4 and earlier, it's hard to be  
motivated to worry about Python 3.0, no matter how wonderful it  
looks.  (It doesn't help that my own available time appears to  
decrease daily with the kids and all.)

Python 2.6 seems to be entirely targeted at people who really want to  
be on Python 3, but have code that will need to be ported.  I  
certainly don't view it as interesting in it's own right.

   -Fred

-- 
Fred Drake   <fdrake at acm.org>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-January/075814.html below:

[Python-Dev] Contributing to Python