On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:15:04AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: -> We're getting a fair number of doc contributions, especially since the -> docs were converted from Latex to ReST, and especially since the start -> of the GHOP project. -> -> My main gripe is with code contributions to Py3k and 2.6; Py3k is -> mostly done by a handful of people, and almost nobody is working much -> on 2.6. What needs to be done with 2.6? I'm happy to review patches, although even were commit access on offer I'm too scatterbrained to do a good job of it. Incidentally, I'm planning to set up an SVK repos containing the GHOP doc patches; that way they can stay sync'ed with 2.6 work. I'd be happy to do the same thing with reviewed-and-probably-OK patches, although I don't know if repository proliferation is a generally good idea ;). --titus
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4