We're getting a fair number of doc contributions, especially since the docs were converted from Latex to ReST, and especially since the start of the GHOP project. My main gripe is with code contributions to Py3k and 2.6; Py3k is mostly done by a handful of people, and almost nobody is working much on 2.6. --Guido On Jan 3, 2008 11:05 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai at in-nomine.org> wrote: > Guido, > > -On [20080103 19:38], Guido van Rossum (guido at python.org) wrote: > >We're thin on contributors as it is (have you noticed how few people are > >submitting anything at all lately?). > > When you say this are you talking about code or contributions all over the > project, e.g. documentation? > > Is there a reason that it thinned out? > > I'm asking since I never really dove into the Python project much aside from > using Python here and there, but I seem to get a career using Python almost > full-time so perhaps there are things I, and I am sure others, can step up to > help out. > > -- > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai > $B%$%'%k!<%s(B $B%i%&%U%m%C%/(B $B%t%!%s(B $B%G%k(B $B%&%'%k%t%'%s(B > http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ > A frightened mental vortex we will be, a Sun we seek, a Sun we flee... > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4